Accessibility and Inclusion Blog Post
Accessibility and Inclusion Blog Post
By: Nate Finegold
Museums are known for their historical significance and their ability to transport its patrons into different worlds. If you were ever a kid growing up in public school, you have most likely had field trips to local museums to get a more hands-on approach to learning. One thing you might not have noticed as a kid, is the fees to get into the museum in the first place. Nowadays, as an adult, if you go to a museum to explore these different worlds you will notice that the museum fees have gotten a bit pricier.
Now of course museums are affordable for most middle-class people, on
average an adult ticket will costs around 20-25$, with some variance depending
on location. This is not an insanely high fee, but for people living paycheck
to paycheck, that may be the difference in eating that night (Rushton). This article was posted over ten years ago and many of the issues noted have actually gotten worse since then. If museums want
to be pillars in the community and offer a learning experience like no other, to
all, then how do they justify their higher prices?
Most of the money spent on tickets to a museum go straight to upkeep as
well as employees’ salaries, so it is important that money is flowing into
museums. This begs the question; can museums continue to a be a public service
while charging everyone expensive prices? To understand this, we first must
understand that most museums get their funding from either the government, or
private donations. The United States government give 47.5 million dollars to museums and libraries yearly, which is an astonishing low number (AAMS). They do not solely rely on ticket sales; however, they are
integral to the business of museums. Museums need a steady flow of income to
survive, but is charging higher prices a good way to go about
it?
In order to keep attendance in museums up while still being able to
collect money, museums have an option to make the admission itself free, but proposing a
donation of the same price in order to keep the museum going. This way people
can still help the museum and it still makes money, but it
doesn't restrict anyone of a lower income class to attend the museums. For
people who can genuinely not afford the museum but still want to share in its
knowledge, this opens the door to them and their families, with the museum
still being able to collect the fees from the optional donations.
Another way around this is museums having 'variable pricing' or specific
deals on specific days, like the Frick Museum, which has free admission on the
first Friday of every month. Other museums have policies that let kids
under 18 always get in for free. These efforts have been well received and keep
the museum above water financially while also creating life long fans of museums (Grant).
While these efforts of making museums more available to everyone in the
general public has a lot of support around the country, many believe that the
prices for museums are entirely justified. As Michael Rushton puts it, " I can take my three
children to see one of the greatest collections of visual art in the world for
about the same family price as taking them to see The Croods this
weekend. It would cost me less than a family lunch at our local
Applebee’s." He brings up a good point, the value of some museums requires
the price point to be set where it is, and if you compare other price points of
certain entertainment then you can see that museum's aren't really
that expensive in comparison. However, one thing he doesn't seem to
understand is that museums offer something for everyone in the public, and museums
should be enjoyed by all. Some people cannot physically afford to go to a
museum, or go to see a new movie in theatres. They might be only able to afford
a lunch at Applebee's and if it’s a choice between feeding their kids and
the museum they are going to pick feeding their kids. Many of these other options he brings up are luxuries, while museums are supposed to be a public service intended for everyone. It has also been proven that museums, are important for development, education, and connecting communities (Hill). Museums can be a solution
not a problem in these scenarios. By adopting pricing
practices talked about earlier, museums can be a community pillar and offer
free, fun, learning experiences for all, while also still being able to keep
their finances stable.
Works Cited
Grant, D. (2017, March 15). The admission fees are too damn high. Observer. https://observer.com/2017/03/rising-admission-fees-museums-moma-met/
Hill (2020, January 15). What are the benefits of visiting a museum?. Hill Aerospace Museum. https://www.aerospaceutah.org/what-are-the-benefits-of-visiting-a-museum/#:~:text=Museums%20preserve%20and%20exhibit%20important,teach%2C%20inspire%20and%20connect%20communities.
Museum Services funding. aam-us.org. (n.d.). https://www.aam-us.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/IMLS-2022-Issue-Brief-April.pdf
Miller, B. (2022, June 28). This is now the most expensive museum in New York City. New York Post. https://nypost.com/2022/06/28/the-metropolitan-museum-of-art-is-nycs-priciest-museum/
Rushton, M. (2013, March 26). Museums are not expensive. For What It’s Worth. https://www.artsjournal.com/worth/2013/03/museums-are-not-expensive/

I really enjoyed reading your post! You bring up some excellent points about the costs of attending museums and how that might conflict with the inflow of money that helps keep the museum going. I really like your suggestion about donations, but I think I would personally be worried about few to no people donating because it's optional. How would you encourage middle to upper class families to want to donate? I also really like the points you brought up about free days or free admission for certain ages. I think anything "free" really gets families excited about doing family activities together, especially at a museum.
ReplyDelete